Is (p>q)>[(p>q)>q] a tautology? Why or why not?
The Answer to the Question
is below this banner.
Can't find a solution anywhere?
NEED A FAST ANSWER TO ANY QUESTION OR ASSIGNMENT?
Get the Answers Now!You will get a detailed answer to your question or assignment in the shortest time possible.
Here's the Solution to this Question
Let us show that the formula is not a tautology. Taking into account that for we have that we conclude that the formula is not a tautology.