H_0:p=p_0=0.2H 0 :p=p 0 =0.2 H_1:p\not=0.2H 1 :p =0.2 Test statistics T={\frac {{\frac m n}-p_0} {p_0*(1-p_0)}}*\sqrt{n}T= p 0 ∗(1−p 0 ) n m −p 0 ∗ n , where m - number of satisfiyung observations, n - sample size In the given case we have T={\frac {{\frac {45} {250}}-0.2} {0.2*0.8}}*\sqrt{250}\approx -1.98T= 0.2∗0.8 250 45 −0.2 ∗ 250 ≈−1.98 Since the sample size is big(>30), then it is appropriate to use z-score as critical value C, so, since we run two-tailed test P(Z>C)={\frac {0.01} 2}=0.005\implies C=2.58P(Z>C)= 2 0.01 =0.005⟹C=2.58 Since T\in(-2.58,2.58)T∈(−2.58,2.58) , then we should accept the null hypothesis and conclude that, based on the data, there is no statisticsal evidence at \alpha=0.01α=0.01 to conclude that p\not=0.2p =0.2
The Answer to the Question
is below this banner.
Can't find a solution anywhere?
NEED A FAST ANSWER TO ANY QUESTION OR ASSIGNMENT?
Get the Answers Now!You will get a detailed answer to your question or assignment in the shortest time possible.
Here's the Solution to this Question
Test statistics
, where m - number of satisfiyung observations, n - sample size
In the given case we have
Since the sample size is big(>30), then it is appropriate to use z-score as critical value C, so, since we run two-tailed test
Since , then we should accept the null hypothesis and conclude that, based on the data, there is no statisticsal evidence at to conclude that