Solution to Two independent samples of sizes 8 and 7 contained the following values: Sample I : … - Sikademy
Author Image

Archangel Macsika

Two independent samples of sizes 8 and 7 contained the following values: Sample I : 19 17 15 21 16 18 16 14 Sample II : 16 14 15 19 15 18 16 Do the estimates of the population variance differ significantly at 5% level?

The Answer to the Question
is below this banner.

Can't find a solution anywhere?

NEED A FAST ANSWER TO ANY QUESTION OR ASSIGNMENT?

Get the Answers Now!

You will get a detailed answer to your question or assignment in the shortest time possible.

Here's the Solution to this Question


\bar{x}_1=\dfrac{19+ 17+ 15 +21+ 16+ 18 +16 +14}{8}=17

s_1^2=\dfrac{\sum_i(x_i-17)^2}{8-1}=5.142857



\bar{x}_2=\dfrac{16 +14 +15 +19+ 15 +18 +16}{7}=\dfrac{113}{7}

s_2^2=\dfrac{\sum_i(x_i-\dfrac{113}{7})^2}{7-1}=3.142857

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H_0:\sigma_1^2=\sigma_2^2

H_1:\sigma_1^2\not=\sigma_2^2

This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a F-test for two population variances needs to be used.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is \alpha = 0.05, df_1=8-1=7, df_2=7-1=6 degrees of freedom, and the the rejection region for this two-tailed test test is 

R = \{F: F < 0.1954 \text{ or } F > 5.6955\}


The F-statistic is computed as follows:


F=\dfrac{s_2^2}{s_1^2}=\dfrac{5.142857}{3.142857}=1.6363

Since from the sample information we get that

F_L=0.1954\le F=1.6363\le5.6955=F_R,


it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population variance \sigma_1^2  is different than the population variance \sigma_2^2, at the \alpha = 0.05 significance level.


Related Answers

Was this answer helpful?

Join our Community to stay in the know

Get updates for similar and other helpful Answers

Question ID: mtid-4-stid-46-sqid-1738-qpid-208